British Airways employee loses fight to wear cross

By Dan Wooding
Founder of ASSIST Ministries
LONDON, UK (ANS) A British Airways (BA) employee has lost her fight to openly wear a cross necklace at work at London’s Heathrow Airport. 

A British Airways (BA) employee has lost her fight to openly wear a cross necklace at work at London’s Heathrow Airport. In a story on the BBC website, it was revealed that Nadia Eweida, 55, of Twickenham, London, has been on unpaid leave since her bosses said she could not visibly wear her tiny white gold cross at the check-in counter. Nadia, a Coptic Christian who is single and looks after her elderly mother, was born in Egypt to an Egyptian father and English mother.She found out she had lost her appeal against the decision by BA when she met with the airline bosses on Monday, November 20.

“BA denied it had banned the wearing of crosses and said Ms Eweida had a right to a second appeal,” said the BBC story.

“It said its uniform policy stated that such items could be worn if concealed underneath the uniform.”

Ms. Eweida said she was effectively “forced” to take unpaid leave after refusing to conceal the Christian symbol.

She said during Monday’s meeting, British Airways told her it respected her faith and accepted the cross was not jewelry, but would be standing by its original decision.

Ms. Eweida added: “I am fairly disappointed but I’m looking forward to the next stage because the cross is important and the truth will be revealed.

“It is important to wear it to express my faith so that other people will know that Jesus loves them.”

Ms. Eweida said people of other faiths were allowed to wear visible religious symbols such as headscarves and she wanted to be allowed to do the same.

She has been supported by the country’s second most senior Church of England cleric. 

 The BBC said that Dr. John Sentamu, the Ugandan-born Archbishop of York, has urged BA to reconsider, calling their decision “nonsense.”

 The BBC said that Dr. John Sentamu, the Ugandan-born Archbishop of York, has urged BA to reconsider, calling their decision “nonsense.”“Question of practicality”

BA said in a statement: “British Airways has 34,000 uniformed staff, all of whom know they must abide by our uniform policy.

“The policy does not ban staff from wearing a cross. It lays down that personal items of jewelry, including crosses may be worn - but underneath the uniform. Other airlines have the same policy.

“The policy recognises that it is not practical for some religious symbols - such as turbans and hijabs - to be worn underneath the uniform. This is purely a question of practicality. There is no discrimination between faiths.

“In Nadia Eweida’s case, she is not suspended and we want her to come back to work. We have explained to her the need to comply with the uniform policy like all her colleagues whatever their faith.”

BA said Ms Eweida had been offered a non-uniformed post were she would be able to openly wear her cross but had refused to take it.

She now has seven days to lodge another appeal against the airline’s decision.



 

Sponsored Links:




 

Search



AddThis Feed Button


Author: editor editor's website editor's email
Post Date: Tuesday, November 21st, 2006
Categories: Christianity
Trackback: Trackback
 







[Valid RSS feed]

Add to My Yahoo!  Add to Google

Add to My MSN   Add to My AOL

Subscribe in NewsGator Online  

Add to Technorati Favorites!   Subscribe with Bloglines