WASHINGTON - Russia on Wednesday defended its sale of arms to Syria and stepped up the rhetoric by accusing the United States of providing weapons to the Syrian rebels.
Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said in Moscow that Russia is supplying “anti-air defense systems” to Damascus in a deal that “in no way violates international law.” He said this “contrasts with what the United States is doing … which is providing arms to the Syrian opposition that are being used against the Syrian government.”
His response comes after U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Tuesday that Washington is concerned about reports Russia is sending attack helicopters to the Syrian government, a longtime Russian ally.
Clinton also rejected Russia’s claim that its arms shipments to Syria are unrelated to the uprising, calling it “patently untrue.” She said the U.S. has urged Russia to stop those arms transfers.
Given its strong economic and military ties with Syria, experts say Russia has become a key player in the Syrian crisis, now in its 15th month of an uprising by government opponents.
Russia, and before that the Soviet Union, have for decades provided economic and military assistance to the Syrian government, including MiG fighter planes and sophisticated air defenses.
Moscow also maintains a Soviet-era naval facility in the Syrian Mediterranean Sea port of Tartus and plans to modernize the base to accommodate larger warships, including aircraft carriers.
Experts say the Kremlin’s close relationship with Damascus has colored Russia’s reaction to the crisis in Syria. Moscow has resisted Western efforts against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, even as key world powers other than China are demanding he leave office.
Russia joined China in vetoing a United Nations Security Council resolution calling for the Syrian president to step down. U.S. Secretary of State Clinton called the vote “a travesty.”
Stephen Cohen, professor emeritus at Princeton University and New York University, says Moscow used its veto power because it felt betrayed when it abstained on a Security Council resolution establishing a no-fly zone over Libya in March of last year.
“Russia was told that force will not be used, only the enforcement of a no-fly zone over [Moammar] Gadhafi’s Libya,” says Cohen. “When American-led NATO went to war against Gadhafi in Libya, Moscow saw that as a broken promise.”
Cohen says Moscow vowed not to take Washington’s word again regarding the use of force.
“So when that issue against the Syrian government arose [at the U.N. Security Council] more recently, the Russians vetoed it and it was not surprising,” he said. “They had Libya on their minds.”
Robert Legvold, with Columbia University, says the Russian action at the United Nations has had negative consequences.
“The Russian position on Syria, as the China position on Syria, has done very serious damage to the relationship with the U.S. and the European Union members,” Legvold said, adding that it has “bruised, angered and frustrated” the Obama administration.
Despite its vetoes at the United Nations, Moscow has endorsed the peace plan of international envoy Kofi Annan. That cease-fire has failed to take hold since it was put forth in April amid attacks by government forces and anti-government rebels.
Experts say Russia has tried to play a mediating role in the conflict, hosting Syrian government officials in Moscow and, separately, members of the opposition.
John Parker of the National Defense University says Moscow can exert pressure on Syria.
“But it doesn’t seem to have been very successful so far,” said Parker, expressing his own views on the issue. “If you would really press the Russians, they think that eventually, Bashar al-Assad will fall. But they want to slow down the process and keep it from becoming as violent, as it has the potential to become violent.”
Vitaly Churkin, Russia’s ambassador to the United Nations, says the “Syrian situation has a very grave potential of impacting not only Syria in a very bad way, but the region.”
Churkin says the region “is extremely fragile, from Libya to Iran. So the prospect of quite dramatic developments not just in Syria but regionally, is there,” he said.
The U.S., meanwhile has warned Russia that it will not be party to any Syria peace plan that includes Iran.
Lavrov has called for a broader international contact group on the crisis to include Iran. Clinton says there is no place for Iran in those talks because of its active support for the Syrian military and pro-government militiamen.
“The Iranians are bragging publicly about the advice, the material support, the techniques and tactics that they have been providing the Syrian regime,” U.S state department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said last week. “They are proud of the role they have played in the regime’s use of violence.
“With the Russians, the issue is a question of how best to end the violence. The Russians have supported the Kofi Annan six-point plan.”
Source: VOA News